Dashrath Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41624 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -154 Year- 2017 Thana -CHIRAIYA District- EAST CHAMPARAN (MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Dashrath Sahani Son of late Makhan Sahani Resident of Village- Lalbegiya, P.S. Chiraiya, District- Muzaffarpur.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Rashmi Jha, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Ms. Veena Rani Prasad, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 154/2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 413, 414, 420, 467, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code.

Since the alleged stolen vehicles have been recovered from the house of this petitioner, the explanation being furnished by the learned counsel for the petitioner that he is father-in-law of Ramdeni Sahani and had no knowledge of the alleged stolen vehicles standing on his door cannot be accepted for purpose of grant of anticipatory bail.

If the petitioner surrenders in the court below within a

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41624 of 2017 (3) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 period of four weeks from today, the court below shall consider the case of the petitioner for grant of regular bail keeping in mind the materials collected by police in course of investigation and the other circumstances which have been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner.

This Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner in the present case in connection with Chiraiya P.S. Case No. 154/2017.

The application is accordingly dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Dilip, AR U T