Bhola Rai @ Bhola Ray v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61815 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-166 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Bhola Rai @ Bhola Ray, Son of Amod Rai @ Amod Ray, R/o Village -Chhotki Kharw (Fatehpur Mathiya), P.S. -Sahar, Dist.- Bhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ravi Shankar Roy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 08-09-2025 Heard Mr. Ravi Shankar Roy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Satya Nand Shukla, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103(1), 109, 190, 191(2), 191(3), 61(2) of the B.N.S. and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
3. The case of the prosecution is that Priyanshu Rai, Nandu Rai, Chotak Rai, Lala Rai and Deepak Rai have fired at the husband of the informant. In the second part, it is alleged that the named accused persons have conspirated.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further been submitted that the name of this petitioner has surfaced during
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61815 of 2025(2) dt.08-09-2025 2/2 investigation and he was apprehended in Sahar P.S. Case No. 27 of 2015 in which he has made his confessional statement. Save and except the confessional statement there is nothing against him. It has also been submitted that the persons who were named in the F.I.R. and were alleged to have conspirated the offence have been granted bail by learned co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide Cr. Misc. Nos. 4080 of 2025 and 89863 of 2024. The case of this petitioner stands on better footing. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2025.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has vehemently opposed the the application for bail.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned A.C.J.M.-VI, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Sahar P.S. Case No. 166 of 2024.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) lata/- U T