Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Kumar v. The State Of Bihar Through The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise And Prohibition Department

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Writ Jurisdiction Case No.2608 of 2018 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-106 Year-2018 Thana- GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL COMP. District- Sitamarhi ====================================================== Ajay Prasad @ Ajay Kumar, Son of Late Devendra Prasad, Resident of Mohalla- Pupra, Ward No. 06, Police Station- Pupri, District- Sitamarhi. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector-cum- District Magistrate, Sitamarhi.

4. The Superintendent of Excise, Sitamarhi.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Vikash Kumar (Sc 11) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 01-11-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel representing the State.

This application has been filed for a Mandamus directing the State respondents to release/unseal the House of the petitioner seized in connection with G.O. 106 of 2018 registered under Sections 30(A) of Bihar Prohibition & Excise Act, 2016.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that as per the allegations, 39.400 liters of illicit liquor have been recovered from the House. It is submitted that the petitioner has not received any notice of confiscation proceeding for the property

Patna High Court Cr. WJC No.2608 of 2018(2) dt.01-11-2018 2/2 in question.

Learned counsel for the State is present.

Pending initiation/finalization of confiscation proceeding pursuant to G.O. 106 of 2018, let the House of the petitioner be de-sealed and possession be handed over to the petitioner on the petitioner depositing the original title deed of the property in question as security with one surety to the extent of value of the property with the court below. On submission of the original title deed of the property in question with the surety, the House shall be de-sealed and possession be handed over within two days thereof. The title deed deposited by the petitioner shall be kept in safe custody of the court below. The owner of the property shall undertake that during the pendency of the confiscation proceeding he will not deal with the property in question and shall not create any third party interest whatsoever.

The application is allowed to the extent as stated hereinabove.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) avin/- U T