Bhanu Pratap Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.20304 of 2018 ====================================================== Bhanu Pratap Singh, Son of Late Bashishth Singh, Resident of VillageAnatpur,Post Ruppur,Police Station-Mohania,Distt.-Kaimur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Department of Health, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Director-in-Chief Health Services, Govt. of Bihar, Patna 3.
The Regional Deputy Director, Health Services, Patna Division,Patna 4.
The Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua 5.
The Additional Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua 6.
Deputy Superintendent Sub-Divisional Hospital, Mohania 7.
The Incharge Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Bhabua, Distt.- Kaimur ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Jitendra Kumar Roy, Advocate.
For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Nagendra Prasad Yadav -SC 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 28-08-2020 No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to press this application when the case is taken up through Video Conferencing, while Mr. Sudhir Kumar Singh, learned AC to SC 23 for the State is present.
On preceding date also none was present on behalf of the petitioner to press this application.
Learned AC to SC 23 appearing for the State submits that the present writ application has been preferred against the order dated 04.04.2018, as contained in letter no. 578 (Annexure
Patna High Court CWJC No.20304 of 2018(4) dt.28-08-2020 2/2 1 of the writ application), issued by the Civil Surgeon-cumChief Medical Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua, by which, petitioner was put under suspension but the suspension of the petitioner has already been revoked vide memo no. 176 dated 27.11.2018 (Annexure J of the counter affidavit) issued by the Civil Surgeon-cum-Chief Medical Officer, Kaimur at Bhabua. As such, this application has become infructuous. Annesure J of the counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent nos. 4 to 7 indicates that the suspension of the petitioner has already been revoked. In the aforesaid circumstances, this writ application is dismissed as become infructuous.
(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U