Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61447/2024bail rejected

Pankaj Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-26Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61447 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-99 Year-2024 Thana- RAJAOLI District- Nawada ====================================================== 1.

Pankaj Kumar son of Vijay Yadav Resident Of Village -Gopalpur Dibour Ps -Rajauli District- Nawada 2.

Pawan Kumar son of Vijay yadav Resident Of Village -Gopalpur Dibour Ps -Rajauli District- Nawada ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, Advocate For the State :

Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 26-09-2024 Heard Mr. Sheo Kumar Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Umeshanand Pandit, learned APP appearing on behalf of the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 324, 325, 307, 379, 337, 338, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, allegation against all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, is of commission of assault upon husband and son of informant by means of Garasa and axe.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61447 of 2024(3) dt.26-09-2024 2/2 behalf of the petitioners that petitioner are innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, due to land dispute between the parties, this false and concocted case has been lodged. Petitioners claim clean antecedents.

5. On the other hand, learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners and submitted that petitioners are named in the F.I.R. and there is specific accusation that they assaulted husband and son of informant. Doctor has found the injuries, sustained by the injured, to be grievous in nature.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, gravity of offence and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is rejected.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) shashank/- U T