Aaftab Alam v. The State Of Bihar And ORS
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.15568 of 2011 ====================================================== Aaftab Alam, son of Abdul Hai, Resident Of Village-Parsa, P.S.-Parsa, P.S. Bela , District-Sitamarhi.
At Present Panchayat Teacher, Madhya Vidyalay, Parsa Urdu, P.S.-Bela, District-Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State Of Bihar.
2. The District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Sitamarhi Through Its Member.
3. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. Of Bihar, Patna.
4. The District Superintendent Of Education, Sitamarhi.
5. The Mukhia, Gram Panchayat Raj, Parsa, Parihar Block, DistrictSitamarhi.
6. The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj, Parsa, Block-Parihar, District-Sitamarhi.
7. Abdus Samad son of Late Md. Siddique Resident Of Village P.O.-Parsa, P.S.-Bela, District-Sitamarhi.
At present - Head Master in Charge, Middle School Parsa Urdu, Block - Parihar, District - Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Dinesh Jha For the Respondent/s : AC to GP No. 7 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAKESH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 22-05-2017 After some argument, Sri Dinesh Jha , learned counsel for the petitioner , in presence of learned AC to GP No. 7 requests for disposal of the present writ petition so that, petitioner may approach the Bihar State Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as the "Appellate Tribunal")
Patna High Court CWJC No.15568 of 2011 (3) dt.22-05-2017 2/2 which according to learned State Counsel has already started functioning.
The prayer is allowed.
The writ petition stands disposed of with liberty as indicated above.
It goes without saying that if the petitioner approaches the "Appellate Tribunal" within a period of six weeks from today, the learned "Appellate Tribunal" may consider the Appeal on its own merit without examining the question of limitation since the writ petition was filed in the year 2011 itself. (Rakesh Kumar, J) Praful/- U