Bimal Kumar Ram @ Vimal Kumar Ram @ Bimal Ram @ Vimal Ram v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58031 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-1189 Year-2023 Thana- ROHTAS COMPLAINT CASE District- Rohtas ====================================================== Bimal Kumar Ram @ Vimal Kumar Ram @ Bimal Ram @ Vimal Ram S/oVishwamitra Ram Resident of Village- Natwar Khurd PS- Natwar DistrictRohtas ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar 2.
Anju Devi W/o- Bimal Kumar Ram @ Vimal Kumar Ram @ Bimal Ram @ Vimal Ram, D/o- Surendra Ram Village- Natwar Khurd, Ps- Natwar DistRohtas, A/P- Village- Konar Ps- Shivsagar Dist- Rohtas ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Ashutosh Tripathy, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Rina Sinha, A.P.P.
For the O.P. No. 2 :
Mr. R.K. Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 01-12-2025 Earlier, vide order dated 30.08.2025, the matter was referred to the Mediation and Conciliation Centre, Patna High Court, Patna, but as per the Mediator's Report (flag 'M'), the mediation has failed.
2. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
3. The petitioner apprehends arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 323, 379, 498A, 504 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
4. As per prosecution case, marriage of complainant was solemnized with this petitioner in the year 2013. Thereafter,
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58031 of 2025(3) dt.01-12-2025 2/3 it is alleged that complainant was subjected to torture and cruelty due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner, while denying the allegations levelled against him, submits that petitioner, who is husband of the complainant, is ready to keep her with honour and safety. Besides this, petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/-per month to the complainant by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings.
6. In view of the aforesaid undertaking of learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is ready to give Rs. 3000/- per month to the complainant by way of temporary relief/solace, starting from this month, this anticipatory bail application is allowed.
7. Let the above-named petitioner, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Rohtas at Sasaram in connection with Complaint Case No. 1189 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482(2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita as well as on the following
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58031 of 2025(3) dt.01-12-2025 3/3 conditions:- '(1) Complainant would file an affidavit before the court below and bring on record her savings bank account number for its communication to the petitioner.
(2) Petitioner would deposit the aforesaid maintenance amount per month in the savings bank account of the complainant.
(3) In case, the petitioner fails to deposit the maintenance amount for two consecutive months, the court below would be at liberty to cancel the bail-bond.
(4) The aforementioned payment will be subject to any order passed in matrimonial, maintenance or connected proceedings. The present order, in no way, will preclude the parties to resolve the issue otherwise.'
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T