Chandrika Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.295 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -168 Year- 2016 Thana -HISUA District- NAWADA ====================================================== Chandrika Chaudhary S/o Mahavir Chaudhary, R/O village- Mahadeva, P.S. Hisua, District- Nawada .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Deepak Kumar For the Opposite Party/s : Smt. Veena Rani Prasadd. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-01-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 168 of 2016 for the offences instituted under Sections 341, 323, 447, 307, 379, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he along with other co-accused abused the father of the informant for withdrawing Hisua P.S. Case No. 152 of 2016 upon which the informant replied that she does not know about it. It is further alleged that co-accused Puja Devi gave khanti blow to her father with intention to kill him on his head, causing head injury due to which she became senseless. Then co-accused Puja Devi snatched golden chain from the neck of the informant. Thereafter the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.295 of 2017 (2) dt.10-01-2017 2/2 villagers assembled there then the life of the informant was saved. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. The nature of injury is said to be simple. No offence under Section 307 of the Indian Penal Code is made out against the petitioner. On behalf of the State, it has been submitted that the petitioner is named in the F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner above named be released on anticipatory bail in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today in connection with Hisua P.S. Case No. 168 of 2016 on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Nawada, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J.) Amit/- U T