← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./57460/2022allowed

Ranjit Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-20Mr. Justice Anjani Kumar Sharan2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57460 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-104 Year-2021 Thana- CHANDAN District- Banka ====================================================== 1.

Ranjit Yadav Son Of Sukhdev Yadav R/O Village- Bhorsar, P.S.- Chandan (Anandpur O.P.), Distt.- Banka 2.

Reshmi Devi Wife Of Sukhdev Yadav R/O Village- Bhorsar, P.S.- Chandan (Anandpur O.P.), Distt.- Banka 3.

Bebi Devi Wife Of Ranjit Yadav R/O Village- Bhorsar, P.S.- Chandan (Anandpur O.P.), Distt.- Banka ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Mukherjee For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Akhileshwar Dayal ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 20-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 304B/34of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners are said to have committed murder of the daughter of the informant by hanging due to non-fulfillment of demand of dowry.

Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He submits that the petitioner no. 1 is Bhaisur, petitioner no. 2 is mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 is Gotni of the deceased. He submits that there is no specific overt act

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57460 of 2022(2) dt.20-12-2022 2/2 against the petitioners. He submits that there is general and omnibus allegation levelled against the petitioners. He submits that the petitioners are living separate from the deceased and her husband. He further submits that petitioners have no criminal antecedent as stated in para-3 of this application. Learned APP for the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Chandan (Anandpur) P.S. Case No. 104 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438

(2) of the Cr.P.C.

However, learned court below is directed to accept the bail bond of the petitioners once the husband of the deceased surrenders before the learned court below. devendra/- (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) U T