← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62173/2025bail rejected

Md. Shamsad Ansari @ Md. Shamshad v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-15Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62169 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-186 Year-2025 Thana- BIRPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

Md. Parwez Alam @ Md. Parwez Son of Dr Abdul Rauf Resident of Village - Lalpur Goth, Ward no. 14, P.S. - Birpur, Dist. - Supaul. 2.

Nafis Alam @ Nafis Son of Phul Mohammad Resident of Village - Lalpur Goth, Ward no. 14, P.S. - Birpur, Dist. - Supaul. 3.

Md. Rustam @ Rustam Son of Md. Tahir @ Tahir R/o Village - Lalpur Goth, Ward no. 14, P.S. - Birpur, Dist. - Supaul.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arun For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Mithlesh Kumar Khare ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence under Sections 191(2)/191(3)/190/126(2)/ 115(2)/109(1)/121(1)/121(2)/132 of the BNS.

3. As per F.I.R., it is alleged that these petitioners along with other F.I.R. named accused persons attacked the police party (enforcement agency) and has taken law in their hand, which is very serious in nature. In the said incident, police personnel also sustained injuries.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62169 of 2025(2) dt.15-09-2025 2/2 petitioners are innocent and have been falsely implicated in this case. He further submits that not a single witness has been examined in support of the prosecution case. Petitioners claim clean antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner is rejected. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Saif/- U T