Ram Sewak Paswan And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.41555 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -62 Year- 2017 Thana -SARAI RANJAN District- SAMASTIPUR ======================================================
1. Ram Sewak Paswan, Son of Late Ganaur Paswan,
2. Sunil Paswan,
3. Subodh Paswan, Both are sons of Ram Sewak Paswan, All resident of Village- Mushapur, Police Station- Gatho, District- Samastipur. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Choudhary Shyam Nandan For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Anita Kumari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 08-09-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State. The petitioners apprehend arrest in Sarairanjan (Ghotho) P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section-307 & other minor Sections of the Indian Penal Code. The instant case is counter blast of Complaint Case No. 1385 of 2015, filed by petitioner No. 2. In the instant case, there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. The injury report has been annexed as Annexure-3 wherein the doctor has stated that opinion about the nature of injury cannot be established and as such, opinion is kept reserved.
In such circumstances, prayer for anticipatory bail is allowed and it is ordered that the petitioners named above in the event of their arrest or surrender in the court below within six weeks from the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41555 of 2017 (2) dt.08-09-2017 2/2 date of receipt/production of copy of this order, shall be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with in Sarairanjan (Ghotho) P.S. Case No. 62 of 2017 to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-VI, Samastipur subject to condition as laid down u/S 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason, will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners. (Sanjay Priya, J) A.K.V./- U T