Bikram Kumar Tiwary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3241 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -359 Year- 2015 Thana -LALGANJ District- VAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ====================================================== Bikram Kumar Tiwary S/o - Vinay Kumar Tiwary @ Pappu Tiwary R/o - Pajhia, P.S. - Lalganj, District - Vaishali.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Anjani Parashar with Mr. Vishwajeet Kumar Mishra, Advocates For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Md. Sufiyan, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Lalganj P.S.Case No. 359 of 2015 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 149, 148, 447, 435, 436, 427 and 380 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that it is alleged in the FIR one accident took place in which granddaughter of Rajendra Choudhary died and thereafter 300-400 persons assembled there and in the meantime police case and intervened and the matter was pacified and it again alleged that later on 9-10 persons, including this petitioner came to the place of occurrence and set on fire the house of the informant. It has further been submitted that three FIRs. have been lodged for the same

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3241 of 2017 (3) dt.09-02-2017 2/2 occurrence, out of which in two cases the petitioner has been granted anticipatory bail by the court below and, as such, it is submitted that for the same occurrence lodging of three FIRs. is itself bad.

Heard learned APP also.

Having heard both sides and considering the aforesaid fact, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Let the petitioner surrender and pray for regular bail in the court below, which will be considered keeping in view the fact that for the same occurrence three FIRs. have been lodged and in two of the cases the petitioner is on bail, and disposed of preferably on the same day the bail application is filed. This application is, accordingly, disposed of. (Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) spal/- U