Sajjad Alam @ Md. Sajjad Alam v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61648 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-69 Year-2024 Thana- SANHAULA District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== Sajjad Alam @ Md. Sajjad Alam Son of Hamid Mansuri Resident of villageDisarath, P.S.- Sanhaula, District- Bhagalpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Subodh Prasad For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Shyam Bihari Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 05-10-2024 Heard learned counsels for the parties.

2.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Sanhaula P.S. Case No.69 of 2024, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 346, 323, 376, 504, 506, 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3.

The allegation against the petitioner is that he established physical relation with the informant on the pretext of marriage but later on denied to marry her.

4.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner is quite innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. No such occurrence, in the manner as alleged, has ever taken place. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. It is further submitted that the informant is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61648 of 2024(2) dt.05-10-2024 2/2 major and the physical relation was established with her consent. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent. 5.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail by submitting that the victim has supported the prosecution case in her statement recorded u/s 164 of Cr.PC. 6.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as well as considering the nature of offence, I am not inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The prayer for grant of anticipatory bail on his behalf is hereby rejected. 7.

Accordingly, this application is dismissed.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) shikha/- U T