Patna High CourtMJC/3042/2016disposed

Arun Kumar Jha v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-08-25Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.3042 of 2016 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 3991 of 2015 ====================================================== Arun Kumar Jha, son of Late Augrah Jha, resident of Village: Tardiha, P.S.- Madhepur, District- Madhubani.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Mr. Amir Subahani, the Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Mr. Kuldeep Narayan, the District Magistrate, Madhubani.

4. Mr. Tarique Iqbal, the District Panchayat Raj Officer, Madhubani.

5. Mr. Gulab Mustafa, the Sub- Divisional Officer, Jainagar, DistrictMadhubani.

6. Mr. Satrunjay Kumar Singh, the Block Development Officer, Basopatti, District- Madhubani,

7. Mr. Saroj Kumar Baitha, the Block Development Officer, Madhepur, Madhubani.

.... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Mohan Prasad Yadav, GP 23 Mr. Arvind Kumar, AC to GP 23 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 25-08-2018 It appears that, after passing of the order by the learned writ Court, the petitioner has been paid a sum of Rs.14,076/- on account of subsistence allowance for the period 11.07.2013 to 25.08.2013. He has also been paid a sum of Rs.34,381/- as arrear of salary and a further payment of Rs.83,774/- for the period July, 2012 to 22.10.2012 and 01.03.2013 to 10.04.2014.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that still

Patna High Court MJC No.3042 of 2016 (2) dt.25-08-2018 the petitioner has not been paid certain amount showing that he was on unauthorized leave.

In the opinion of this Court, if that is the issue, the same would be required to be addressed in an appropriate proceeding.

So far as the contempt proceeding is concerned, going through the order passed by the learned writ Court, this Court does not find any reason to proceed.

The contempt application is disposed off, accordingly.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) R.R.Ojha/- U