Anisoor Rahman @ Ansoori Ali And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.48025 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -49 Year- 2017 Thana -AMDABAD District- KATIHAR ======================================================
1. Anisoor Rahman @ Ansoori Ali, son of late Usman Ali, @ Usman Gani,
2. Alauddin, son of late Mohiuddin,
3. Estab @ Estab Ali, son of Rahman @ A. Rahman, R/o Village- Ghasia Ghat, P.S.- Amdabad, District- Katihar.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arjun Prasad, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 2/ 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
Petitioners apprehend their arrest in Amdabad P.S. Case No.49 of 2017 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 307 and other allied Sections of Indian Penal Code. It has been submitted that there is land dispute between the parties. Counter case has been lodged from the side of the petitioners vide Amdabad P.S. Case No.49 of 2017, which was filed by one of the co-accused- Md. Kalam. Instant case has been filed as counter blast to the aforesaid case. From the written report, it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. In the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer of
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.48025 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 2/2 the petitioners for grant of anticipatory bail is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within six weeks from today in connection with Amdabad P.S. Case No.49 of 2017, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of `10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Katihar, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr. P. C.
with further conditions: (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned, (2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.