Patna High CourtCR. MISC./1536/2017rejected

Md. Islam @ Md. Islam Ansari v. The State Of Bihar

2017-02-15Mr. Justice Jitendra Mohan Sharma2 pages

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1536 of 2017 (3) dt.15-02-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.1536 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -18 Year- 2014 Thana -ISHIPUR District- BHAGALPUR ======================================================

1. Md. Islam @ Md. Islam Ansari, Son of Md. Amir @ Md. Amir Ansari, resident of Village- Shampur, P.S.- Ishipur Barahat, District- Bhagalpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Tarun Prasad Mandal For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Shantanu Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA MOHAN SHARMA ORAL ORDER 15-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. representing the state.

Petitioner seeks bail in connection with Ishipur (Barahat) P.S. Case No. 18 of 2014 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 452, 323, 504, 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The petitioner wants to renew his prayer for bail, which was earlier twice rejected vide order dated 26.02.2015 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 6436/15 and again vide order dated 09.03.2016 passed in Criminal Miscellaneous No. 831 of 2016 on the ground that the petitioner is in custody since 02.04.2014 and the trial has not been concluded in spite of specific direction of this court to conclude the same within four months.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.1536 of 2017 (3) dt.15-02-2017 The learned A.P.P. submits that all the prosecution witnesses have been examined and from the report of learned Trial Judge it reveals that within two months the trial is likely to be concluded.

Under the facts and circumstances stated above, finding no good ground for reconsideration of the prayer of bail of the petitioner, accordingly, his prayer for bail again stands rejected. However, the trial court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same as early as possible, preferably within two months.

(Jitendra Mohan Sharma, J) sushma/- U T