Patna High CourtCR. MISC./3196/2017dismissed

Rajan Sinha v. The State Of Bihar

2017-03-03Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3196 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -107 Year- 2015 Thana -SAHARSA District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Rajan Sinha Son of Late Vijay Prasad Sinha Resident of Kayasth Tola, Ward No. 29, Police Station - Saharsa, District - Saharsa. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Satish Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 03-03-2017 Heard the parties.

This application is for grant of bail in connection with Saharsa Police Station Case No.107 of 2015 for the offence under Sections 324, 307 & 504 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that there is allegation against the petitioner that he assaulted by knife on the injured, however, there was no repetition of blow and the nature of injury has not been mentioned in the case diary. He is in custody for about six months and he has clean antecedent. Heard learned A.P.P. also, who has opposed the prayer for bail, stating that one of the injuries is deep upto abdominal cavity on the lower part of the abdomen, which is grievous in nature. Having heard both sides. In view of allegation as well as

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3196 of 2017 (4) dt.03-03-2017 2/2 nature of the injury, I am not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner at this stage, however, considering the fact that the petitioner is in custody since long, the learned trial court is directed to expedite the trial and try to conclude it within a period of nine months and if not concluded, the petitioner is at liberty to renew his prayer for bail before the learned trial court itself, who will consider all the materials available and will pass appropriate order, without being prejudiced by the order of this Court..

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U