Patna High CourtCWJC/21229/2018disposed

Ajay Kumar And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-05Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21229 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Ajay Kumar, Son of Late Suba Singh, Resident of VillageSafipur, P.S.+P.O.- Khushrupur, District- Patna, at presently posted in Vyapar Mandal Kanya Middle School Fatuha, DistrictPatna.

2. Neelam Sinha, Wife of Sri Rajendra Prasad, Resident of VillageChandashi, P.O.- Noorsarai, P.S.- Noorsarai, Distt- Nalanda. at presently posted in Vyapar Mandal Kanya Middle School Fatuha, District- Patna.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Finance, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Director (Primary Education) Government of Bihar, Patna.

4. The District Education Officer, Patna.

5. The District Programme Officer (Establishment) Patna. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioners :

Mr. Upendra Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Respondents :

Mr. Mukund Mohan Jha, AC to Gp27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that under similar circumstances in case of Nirendra Kumar and others in the proceedings arising out of C.W.J.C.No. 11008 of 2014 this Court has directed the District Education Officer, Patna (respondent no.4) to examine the claim of the petitioners for grant of Matric trained scale. Learned counsel submits that the petitioners would be approaching respondent no.4 in respect of their claim for grant of Matric trained scale by way of filing a detailed representation.

In view of such limited prayer, the writ petition is disposed of.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21229 of 2018(2) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 Petitioners will make their representation within two weeks. Thereafter, respondent no.4 would be obliged to consider their claim in accordance with law and dispose of the same by a reasoned and speaking order within three months thereafter. (Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi U