Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61286/2024bail granted

Dharamsheela Devi v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-10Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61286 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-453 Year-2024 Thana- GOPALGANJ TOWN DistrictGopalganj ====================================================== Dharamsheela Devi W/o Devnath Ram R/o Village- Haziapur, Kaithwalia, P.S.- Gopalganj, District- Gopalganj ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Raghav Prasad, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Sanjay Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 10-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024 dated 18.06.2024 registered for the offences punishable u/ss 304B read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioner and the co-accused person are alleged to have killed the informant's daughter by administering poison to her.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The petitioner is the mother-in-law of the deceased

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61286 of 2024(2) dt.10-09-2024 2/2 and she has no concern with the alleged offence. It is further submitted that the present occurrence took place after 12 years of marriage. There is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioner. As per the impugned order, the post-mortem report of the deceased, there is no external or internal injury was found on the person of the deceased. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is a lady and she is in custody since 19.06.2024.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned, Gopalganj in connection with Gopalganj P.S. Case No. 453 of 2024.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) Gautam/- U T