← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69481/2021bail granted

Mithun Yadav @ Mithun Kumar @ Mithun Raj v. The State Of Bihar

2021-12-24Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69481 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-297 Year-2021 Thana- SAMASTIPUR MUFFASIL DistrictSamastipur ====================================================== MITHUN YADAV @ MITHUN KUMAR @ MITHUN RAJ Son of Yogendra Yadav @ Yogi Yadav Resident of Village- Bargaon, Ward No. 08, P.S.- Hasanpur, District- Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Binod Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Aslam Ansari ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR SINGH ORAL ORDER 24-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State through virtual mode.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove the defect(s), as pointed out by the office, within a period of eight weeks.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case registered under Sections-399, 402 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections- 25(1-b)a, 26/35 of the Arms Act.

Allegedly, country made arms and live cartridges are recovered in this case.

It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has got no criminal antecedent. There is no allegation of tampering of witnesses alleged against the petitioner. The petitioner has been falsely implicated in the present case. Arms

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69481 of 2021(2) dt.24-12-2021 2/2 are said to have been recovered from possession of the coaccused. There is no recovery of arms from conscious possession of the petitioner. The name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by coaccused. Except for this, there is no other substantive evidence to suggest the implication of the petitioner in the present case. On behalf of the State, it is submitted that the petitioner is named in the Complaint Case/F.I.R.

Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, in the event of arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Samastipur in connection with Samastipur Mufassil P.S. Case No. 297 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

(Sudhir Singh, J) A.K.V.//- U T