Anutha Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.626 of 2017 ====================================================== Anutha Prasad Yadav, Son of Late Aryug Prasad, resident of village - Mahangtola Bhadahar, P.O. Rampur, Police Station Chiraiya, District - East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Food and Supply Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna

2. The District Magistrate - Cum - President of District Selection Committee, East Champaran at Motihari

3. The District Supply Officer, East Champaran at Motihari

4. The Sub - Divisional Officer, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran

5. The Assistant District Supply Officer, Sikrahana at Dhaka, East Champaran

6. The Block Development officer, Block Office, Chiraiya, District East Champaran

7. The Circle officer, Circle office, Chiraiya, District East Champaran

8. The Head Master, Raja Ram Rai Madhya Vidyalaya, Mohaddipur, Block Office - Chiraiya, District - East Champaran

9. The Mukhiya Gram Panchayat Raj, Rampur Uttari, Block office, Chiraiya, District - East Champaran

10. The Panchayat Samiti Member Area No. 7, Block office - Chiraiya, District - East Champaran

11. The Ward Member, Ward No. 9, Block Office Rampur Uttari, Block office - Chiraiya, District - East Champaran

12. The Ward Member, Ward No. 10, Block office Rampur Uttari, Block Office - Chiraiya, District East Champaran

13. The Sarpanch Gram Kachahari Uttari, Rampur Uttari, Block Office - Chiraiya, District - East Champaran

14. Sunil Kumar, Son of Late Daroga Rai, resident of village - Rampur Tola Mohaddipur, Police Station Chiraiya, District - East Champaran ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arvind Ujjwal-Sc4 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 29-11-2018 Heard.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be satisfied in case he is granted a liberty to file representation before the respondent no.2 and the respondent

Patna High Court CWJC No.626 of 2017(2) dt.29-11-2018 2/2 no.2 may be directed to dispose of the representation of the petitioner within a specified time frame.

Accordingly, it is directed that the petitioner shall file a representation before the respondent no.2 regarding his grievances raised in the writ petition within a period of four weeks from today and the respondent no.2 is directed to dispose of the same within a period of twelve weeks thereafter. The present writ petition is disposed of on the aforesaid terms.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) Tiwary/- U