Nanhaka @ Md.Nanhaka v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.3249 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -632 Year- 2016 Thana -MUZAFFARPUR TOWN DistrictMUZAFFARPUR ====================================================== Nanhaka @ Md. Nanhaka, son of Md. Mojahid, resident of Mehdi hussain Chowk @ Mehdi Hassan Chowk, P.S-Barhampura, District - Muzaffarpur. .... .... Petitioner

Versus

The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Archana Sinha @ Archana Shahi For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 09-02-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner is accused in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 632 of 2016, registered under Section 414 and 379/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The accusation is that two persons came on motorcycle near the motorcycle of the informant, which was parked near a tea shop, out of which one person started fleeing with the motorcycle of the informant, but on chase he was apprehended by the nearby people, who disclosed his name as Md. Sabir and he also disclosed the name of this petitioner as his associate.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.3249 of 2017 (2) dt.09-02-2017 2/2 name of the petitioner has been surfaced in this case only on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused Md. Sabir, who is said to be apprehended by the Police with the motorcycle of the informant. The petitioner having no criminal antecedent is in custody since 16.09.2016.

Having regard to the facts and the circumstances of the case, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/-(Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Muzaffarpur in connection with Town P.S. Case No. 632 of 2016. Out of two sureties, one surety must be the close relative of the petitioner, who will file an affidavit showing his relation with the petitioner. (Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) manish/- U T