Patna High CourtCWJC/3335/2017disposed

Smt. Babita Devi v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-06-29The Chief Justice,Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3335 of 2017 =========================================================== Smt. Babita Devi W/o Ram Bachan Das, R/o Mohalla- Imadpur, P.S.- Biharsharif, District- Nalanda, through Manav Chetana Vikash Sansthan, Imadpur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Chief Election Commissioner at Patna.

2. District Collector, Nalanda.

3. District Election Officer, Nalanda.

4. Deputy Election Officer, Nalanda.

5. Block Development Officer, Bihar Sharif, Nalanda. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

For the Respondent/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash Ojha, GA-7 Mr. Priya Gupta, A.C. to G.A. 7 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE and HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) Date: 29-06-2017 Petitioner claiming to be a member of a registered society namely Manav Chetna Vikash Sansthan, Imadpur has filed this writ petition for transferring the name of members of the petitioner's society from Booth No. 155 Gandhi Harijan Primary School, Rabidas Tola, Ahrapar to Booth No. 154 Nadipar Muslim Tola Middle School, Imadpur.

2. The question of transfer of voters and members is a question which has to be decided by the competent authority namely Respondent No. 2 and we find from the averments made by the

Patna High Court CWJC No.3335 of 2017 dt.29-06-2017 2/2 petitioner himself vide Annexure-1 that the matter is pending consideration before the competent authority namely Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. That being so, now it is not necessary to make any indulgence into the matter, particularly after the elections are over. The petitioner may represent to Respondent Nos. 2 and 3, who will look into the grievance of the petitioner and take such steps as are permissible under law for ventilating the same before the next election.

3. With the aforesaid, the writ petition stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) P.K.P.

AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.

CAV DATE N.A.

Uploading Date 01.07.2017 Transmission Date