Sona Devi And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.53227 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -185 Year- 2016 Thana -PIPRA DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== 1.

Sona Devi, wife of Duryodhan Ram 2.

Laxman Ram @ Laxuman Ram, son of Duryodhan Ram Both residents of village Kishun Parsauni, P.S. Pipra, Distt. East Champaran.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sangeet Deokuliar, Advocate. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Satyavarat Verma, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 15-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016 instituted for the offence under Sections 304B/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

It has been submitted that petitioners are mother-inlaw and brother-in-law of the deceased. It has further been submitted that husband is already in custody. From the written report it appears that there is general and omnibus allegation against the petitioners. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is allowed. In the event of surrender/arrest of the petitioners, named above, within

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.53227 of 2017 (3) dt.15-11-2017 2/2 six weeks from today, in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 185 of 2016, they shall be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Motihari, East Champaran, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr. P.C. with further conditions (1) bailors should be local having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the court concerned,

(2) petitioners shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court and absence on two consecutive dates without proper and reasonable reason will automatically cancel bail bond of the petitioners and (3) if petitioners tamper with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioners.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T