Rajendra Singh @ Rajendra Prasad v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.58739 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-301 Year-2022 Thana- ARWAL District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RAJENDRA SINGH @ RAJENDRA PRASAD S/O LATE KARIMAN PRASAD Resident of village- Mokari, P.S.- Arwal, District- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ranjay Kumar Singh, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nawal Kishore Prasad, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 03-01-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends her arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 468, 467, 471, 420/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution story in brief is that the informant is widow lady who has alleged that co-accused Kamlesh Kumar, is alleged to have got execution of forged sale deed of 5 katha of land of the informant Sarita devi in his favour, by impersonating another lady in place of the informant and the petitioners are said to be deed writer and witnesses of the alleged forged sale deed. It is also claimed that the market value of the alleged land shall be 70-80 lacs and so, the petitioners besides co-accused persons, on conspiracy to each other, have duped the informant. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.58739 of 2022(2) dt.03-01-2023 2/2 petitioner is innocent and has not committed any offence and has been falsely implicated in this case. It has further submitted that petitioner is deed writer. He has no concern with the alleged occurrence and this case appears to be of civil nature. From the perusal of the FIR, it is evident that the informant did not allege specifically against the petitioner and petitioner is simple deed writer. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in para-3 of this application.

Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for bail. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, be released on bail, in the event of her arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Arwal P.S. Case No. 301 of 2022, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) divyanshi/- U T