Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63186/2023bail granted

Ripusudan Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-09-22Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63186 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-254 Year-2022 Thana- KURTHA District- Jehanabad ====================================================== RIPUSUDAN YADAV S/O Nanhak Yadav R/O Village- Nadauna, P.SKurtha, Distt.- Arwal. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Nitya Nand Neeraj, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 22-09-2023

1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 254 of 2022, dated 19.08.2022 registered for the offence(s) punishable under Section(s) 341, 323, 324, 307 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. This is second attempt of the petitioner for the relief of regular bail after his earlier prayer was rejected by this Bench vide order dated 27.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 69488 of 2022 preferred by this petitioner.

4. The main submissions advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner are that the petitioner earlier preferred Cr. Misc. No. 69488 of 2022 for the relief of regular bail which was rejected by this Bench, giving liberty to the petitioner to renew

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63186 of 2023(2) dt.22-09-2023 2/2 his bail prayer after framing of charge and in view of the said liberty, petitioner has come again before this Court for the same relief as upon him, charges under Sections 341/323/324/504/506/307/34 have been framed on 06.01.2023. Further submissions are that in between both the parties, a land dispute is running and petitioner has been languishing in jail since 20.08.2022.

5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.

6. Considering the above submissions and mainly the petitioner's custody period and stage of his case, in my opinion, petitioner now deserves to the privilege of bail. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Kurtha P.S. Case No. 254 of 2022. (Shailendra Singh, J.) Maynaz/- U T