Patna High CourtCWJC/324/2017disposed

Vijay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-12-12Mr. Justice Jyoti Saran1 pages

Patna High Court CWJC No.324 of 2017 (5) dt.12-12-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.324 of 2017 ====================================================== Vijay Kumar Singh, Son of Sri Laxman Prasad, resident of Shanmati Sadan, Jakkanpur, Janta Road, P.S. Jakkanpur, District - Patna, Bihar. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Labour Resources, Government of Bihar, Nijojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Labour Resources, Government of Bihar, Patna Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

3. The Director, Labour Employment and Training, Government of Bihar, Niyojan Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna.

4. The Principal, Industrial Training Institute, Digha Ghat, Patna. ...... Respondents 1st Set.

5. Union of India through the Director General, National Cadet Corps, Ministry of Defence, West Block, 4 R.K. Puram, New Delhi 110066.

6. The Director General, National Cadet Corps, Ministry of Defence, West Block, 4 R.K. Puram, New Delhi 110060.

7. The Director General, National Cadet Corps, Bihar and Jharkhand, CDA Building Rajendra Path, Patna.

8. The Commanding Officer, 26 Bihar Battalion, House No. 184 Patliputra Colony, Patna 13, Bihar.

.......Respondents 2nd Set.

9. Shri Vinay Kumar, Son of Tribhuvan Prasad, resident of village - Sultanpur, P.S. Dhanarua, District Patna, Bihar, Presently posted as Chief Instructor, Industrial Training Institute, Digha Ghat, Patna. .... .... Respondent 3rd Set.

====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Avinash Shekhar, Adv. For the Respondent/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Rastogi, AAG-10 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JYOTI SARAN ORAL ORDER 12-12-2017 Heard the parties.

In view of the statement present at paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit this matter has been rendered infructuous and in so far as the inter-party difference is concerned, the forum for the petitioner would be otherwise and not by way of writ petition. The petitioner, if so advised, may move departmentally but no cause to proceed in a writ proceeding.

The writ petition is disposed of as having become infructuous.

(Jyoti Saran, J) SKPathak/- U