Dharmendra Singh @ D.K.@ Khekhar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57936 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-124 Year-2022 Thana- RIVILGANJ District- Saran ====================================================== DHARMENDRA SINGH @ D.K.@ KHEKHAR S/O MAKESHWAR SINGH Resident of village- Majhwalia, P.S.- Kopa, District- Saran (Chapra). ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Basishtha Narayan Mishra, Advocate Mr. Brij Kishor Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Pranav Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHAILENDRA SINGH ORAL ORDER 25-04-2023
1. Let the defect(s), if any, pointed out by the office be removed within four weeks from the date of this order, failing which the matter be listed again under the appropriate heading for necessary action.
2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.
3. Petitioner seeks regular bail in connection with Revelganj P.S. Case No. 124 of 2022, dated 18.04.2022 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 25(1-b)a/ 26/35 of the Arms Act.
4. The main submissions advanced by petitioner's counsel are that the petitioner has been made accused merely on the basis of his criminal antecedents but he has got bail in all the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57936 of 2022(4) dt.25-04-2023 2/2 said criminal antecedent cases, in the present matter only two live cartridges are stated to have been recovered from the possession of this petitioner but the said allegation is completely unbelievable as the said cartridges have been recovered without any gun or pistol and possession over the alleged cartridges is meaningless without the gun and moreover, the petitioner has been languishing in jail since 19.04.2022 and against him investigation has been completed.
5. Learned APP appearing for the State has opposed the prayer for bail.
6. Having considered the above submissions, in my opinion it is a fit case for bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, let the petitioner named-above be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the concerned Court in connection with Revelganj P.S. Case No. 124 of 2022. (Shailendra Singh, J.) maynaz/- U T