Mumtaz Mian v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.50565 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -415 Year- 2017 Thana -GHORASAHAN DistrictEASTCHAMPARAN(MOTIHARI) ====================================================== Mumtaz Mian, son of Rasul Mian @ Md. Rasul, resident of village-Ahmad Nagar, P.O.+P.S.-Ghorasahan, District-East Champaran. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pravin Kumar, Adv. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Arun Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJEEV RANJAN PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-10-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

Petitioner is seeking anticipatory bail in connection with Ghorasahan P.S. Case No.415 of 2017 registered for offences punishable under Sections 399 and 402 of the Indian Penal Code. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits name of this petitioner has transpired in the confessional statement of one Santosh Kumar. The said Santosh Kumar is said to have been granted regular bail by the court below on 25.08.2017. Learned APP for the State opposed the prayer for anticipatory bail.

Considering the fact that there is not only confessional statement in which the name of the petitioner has

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50565 of 2017 (2) dt.17-10-2017 transpired, but also that there are three more cases on his head, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. The application is dismissed.

(Rajeev Ranjan Prasad, J) Arvind/- U T