← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./63256/2023dismissed

Amar Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2026-07-24Mr. Justice Sandeep Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63256 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-354 Year-2022 Thana- CHHATAUNI District- East Champaran ====================================================== Amar Kumar Son Of Jay Ram Rai @ Jay Ram Prasad Yadav Resident Of Village Dulma, Ps- Madhuban, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Krity Rai Son Of Anchit Rai Village- Katkuiya Po- Ahirouliya, Ps- Chiraiya, Dist- East Champaran 3.

Pallavi Kumari Wife Of Rajesh Kumar Village- Katkuiya Po- Ahirouliya, Ps- Chiraiya, Dist- East Champaran ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Md. Mushtaque Alam, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 24-07-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

2. The present application has been filed seeking cancellation of the regular bail granted to Opposite Parties vide order dated 27.03.2023 passed in Chhatauni P.S. Case No. 354 of 2022 registered under Sections 406 and 420 of I.P.C.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the opposite parties falsely represented that the vehicle in question belonged to the petitioner. It is further submitted that they cheated the petitioner by neither transferring the ownership of the vehicle in his favour nor providing the vehicle to him on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63256 of 2023(2) dt.24-07-2026 2/2 rent.

4. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as the materials available on record, this Court is of the view that the petitioner has failed to make out a case warranting cancellation of bail, hence, no ground is made out for interference with the impugned order passed by the court below.

5. Accordingly, this application stands dismissed. (Sandeep Kumar, J) tusharika/- U T