Patna High CourtCWJC/21654/2018disposed

Umesh Ram v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-12-05Mr. Justice Madhuresh Prasad2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.21654 of 2018 ====================================================== UMESH RAM SON OF RAMBRIKSH RAM RESIDENT OF VILLAGE PARSAHI POLICE STATION BHOREY, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ ... Petitioner

Versus

1. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA

3. THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, SARAN DIVISION CHAPRA

4. THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE GOPALGANJ, BIHAR

5. THE DEO GOPALGANJ DISTRICT GOPALGANJ BIHAR

6. THE DPO ESTABLISHMENT GOPALGANJ, BIHAR

7. BLOCK EDUCATION OFFICER BLOCK BHYORE DISTRICT GOPALGANJ, BIHAR

8. BABULAL BHAKT SON OF DHANRAJ BHAKT RESIDENT OF SEMABARI, POLICE STATION PHULWARIYA, DISTRICT GOPALGANJ CURRENTLY WORKING AS INCHARGE HEAD MASTER, RAJKIYA MADHYA VIDYALAYA LAMICHOUR, BHOREY GOPALGANJ, BIHAR. ... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Prince Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Arbind Kr.Singh, AC to GO 20.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 05-12-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned counsel for the respondents.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that though the petitioner has been promoted as head master and he has been transferred to Rajkiya Madhya Vidyalaya, Lamichour, Bhorey, Gopalganj upon is transfer but he has not been allowed to assume his duty. He submits that he has also made a representation in this respect before the District Education Officer, Gopalganj (respondent no.5) which has also been received in his office on 19.9.2018. He submits that respondent no.5 be directed to dispose of his representation.

Patna High Court CWJC No.21654 of 2018(2) dt.05-12-2018 2/2 In view of the limited prayer, no useful purpose would be served by keeping the proceedings pending. The DEO, Gopalganj (respondent no. 5) should take a final decision on petitioner's representation dated 19.9.2018 expeditiously and preferably within four weeks from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

The writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) Shashi.