← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./62002/2025bail granted

Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh Mukhiya v. The State Of Bihar

2025-09-22Mr. Justice Arun Kumar Jha3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.62002 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2025 Thana- Andhratharhi District- Madhubani ====================================================== Ramesh Sahani @ Ramesh Mukhiya S/O Ayodhi Sahani R/O Village- Palar, P.S - Andhrthadhi, District - Madhubani.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Arvind Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ganesh Prasad Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ARUN KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 22-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. In the present case, the petitioner seeks bail in connection with Andhrthadhi P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025, registered for the offences under Sections 274, 275 of the BNS and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, police received information about petitioner selling illicit liquor from his hotel. A raid was conducted and recovery of three litre of country made chulai liquor was made from the hotel. The petitioner fled away on seeing the police party.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. Learned counsel further submits

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62002 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 2/3 that the petitioner was not apprehended from the spot and nothing incriminating has been recovered from person or possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 10.06.2025 and he has eight criminal antecedents. Charge sheet has been submitted.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing for the State opposes the submission made on behalf of the petitioner.

6. Having regard to the fact and circumstances and submission made on behalf of the parties and considering the fact that no recovery has been shown from the conscious possession of the petitioner and also considering submission of charge sheet and period of custody of the petitioner, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand Only) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, Excise Act, Jhanjharpur, Madhubani/concerned court, in connection with Andhrthadhi P.S. Case No. 89 of 2025, subject to the condition laid down under Section 480(3) of the BNSS and other following conditions:

(i) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.62002 of 2025(2) dt.22-09-2025 3/3 (ii) The petitioner will remain present on each and every date fixed by the court below, if so required by the learned trial court.

(iii) In case of absence on three consecutive dates or in violation of the terms of the bail, the bail bond of the petitioner will be liable to be cancelled by the court concerned.

(Arun Kumar Jha, J) Anuradha/- U T