Gautam Kumar Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.3584 of 2014 ====================================================== Gautam Kumar Chaudhary Son of Ram Kumar Chaudhary Resident of village Dhepura, P.S. Dalsingh Sarai, District Samstipur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through Finance Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. Bihar State Financial Corporation, Frazer Road, Bihar Govt. Patna, Code No. 8401 through M.D. Bihar State Financial Corporation, Patna .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Rajiv Roy, GP 5 For the Corporation : Mr. Vinay Krishna Tripathy, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 19-01-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls,

2. Learned counsel for the respondent-Corporation files a counter affidavit to submit that the writ petition has become infructuous as the property in question has since been auctioned and a registered sale deed has been executed in favour of the auction purchaser. It is further submitted the writ petition is not maintainable also because the auction purchaser being a necessary party has not been impleaded as party respondent.

3. Be that as it may, in view of non-appearance of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. (Vikash Jain, J) B.T/- U