Patna High CourtCWJC/18721/2010dismissed

Sunil Kumar v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-06-22Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.18721 of 2010 ====================================================== Sunil Kumar S/O Late Naresh Yadav R/O Vill.- Pandaul, P.S.- Sakurabad, Distt.- Jehanabad .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar Through The Secretary, Department Of Home, Patna

2. Director General Of Police, Bihar, Patna

3. Chairman, Constable Selection Committee Central Division, Board No. 1, Hajipur

4. Chairman, Saran Regional Constable Appointment Selection BoardCum-Superintendent Bhojpur

5. Superintendent Of Police, Saran At Chapra .... .... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Mishra For the Respondent/s : Mr. (Ga1) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MOHIT KUMAR SHAH ORAL ORDER 22-06-2018 The present writ petition has been filed for directing the respondents to appoint the petitioner on the post of constable in the Bihar Police in pursuance to the advertisement no.1 of 2004 dated 11.8.2004.

The only reason for filing the present writ petition is that the petitioner has got information that there are 49 vacancies available, hence the petitioner prays that he be appointed against the said post.

It is apparent from the record of the case that the advertisement is of the year 2004 and the petitioner was denied appointment on the post of constable. However, the present writ

Patna High Court CWJC No.18721 of 2010 (2) dt.22-06-2018 2/2 petition was filed in the year 2010 and now, we are in the year 2018. Apart from the delay and laches on the part of the petitioner in approaching this Court, I find that no averment whatsoever has been made in the writ petition so as to even suggest that the petitioner had qualified in pursuance of the aforesaid advertisement.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no merit in the present writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed.

(Mohit Kumar Shah, J) BTiwary/- U