Patna High CourtL.P.A/2204/2015dismissed

Raja Ram Sah And ORS v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2017-02-03Justice Smt. Nilu Agrawal,Mr. Justice Ajay Kumar Tripathi2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Letters Patent Appeal No.2204 of 2015 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 1504 of 2015 ===========================================================

1. Raja Ram Sah

2. Kanhaiya Lal Sah

3. Naresh Sah All sons of Late Mahavir Sah, resident of Village- Sapahi, P.O.- Tribhauni; Police Station- Semar District- West Chamapran. .... .... Appellants

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. The Commissioner, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

3. The District Magistrate, West Champaran.

4. The Superintendant of Police, Bagaha, West Champaran.

5. The Sub Divisional Officer, Bagaha, West Champaran.

6. The Circle Officer, Bagaha-II, West Champaran.

7. Bablu Singh son of Late Algu Singh

8. Pappu Singh son of Late Algu Singh

9. Dhanishankar Singh son of Tipuhi Singh

10. Gaurishankar Singh son of Tipuhi Singh Nos. 7 to 10 are resident of VillageSapahi, Police Station- Semara District- West Chamapran. .... .... Respondents =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Appellants : Mr. Syed Firoz Raza, Advocate Mr. Khatim Reza, Advocate For the Respondents : Mr. Mahendra Prasad Verma, AC to SC-20 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI and HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. NILU AGRAWAL ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI) Date: 03-02-2017 I.A. No. 9550 of 2015 is allowed. Delay of 56 days is condoned for the reasons indicated in the Interlocutory Application. Matter is taken up on merits as well.

The learned single Judge has disposed of the writ application with an observation that the petitioners' grievance stood redressed.

Patna High Court LPA No.2204 of 2015 dt.03-02-2017 2/2 Today counsel for the appellants submits that there are certain villagers who had refused to remove the encroachment and they are still settled on a public rasta, which is a public land. If the cause subsists, the law still can be invoked against such persons.

Appeal is otherwise dismissed since there is no infirmity with the order of the learned single Judge. (Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J) (Nilu Agrawal, J) Pawan/- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE N/A Uploading Date 03.02.2017 Transmission Date N/A