← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./69530/2021withdrawn

Ramesh Chandra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-06Mr. Justice Harish Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.69530 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-2479 Year-2018 Thana- GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE District- Gopalganj ====================================================== 1.

Ramesh Chandra Tiwari, Son of Late Thakur Tiwari @ Raghunath Tiwari, Resident of Village- Humayupur Utthari, P.S.- Gorakhnath, Distt.- Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh).

2.

Sabita Tiwari, W/o Ramesh Chandra Tiwari Resident of VillageHumayupur Utthari, P.S.- Gorakhnath, Distt.- Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh). 3.

Nisa @ Kumum Tiwari, D/o Ramesh Chandra Tiwari, Resident of VillageHumayupur Utthari, P.S.- Gorakhnath, Distt.- Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh). 4.

Nirbhay Tiwari @ Nipouresh Chandra Tiwari, Son of Ramesh Chandra Tiwari Resident of Village- Humayupur Utthari, P.S.- Gorakhnath, Distt.- Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar 2.

Nippu Pandey @ Mandhu Pandey, W/o Niraj Tiwari @ Bibhrat Tiwari, Resident of Village- Humayupur Utthari, P.S.- Gorakhnath, Distt.- Gorakhpur (Uttar Pradesh). At present daughter of Baleshwar Pandey Resident of Village- Rampur Chakrawa, P.S.- Bhore , Distt.- Gopalganj. ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, Adocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mukeshwar Dayal, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 06-09-2024 Mr. Sudhanshu Prakash, learned Advocate submits at the Bar that he has received a fresh Vakalatnama on behalf of the petitioners after getting "No Objection" from the conducting lawyer.

2. Since there are various shortcomings in the quashing application and, as such, he seeks permission to withdraw the present quashing application with liberty to the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.69530 of 2021(2) dt.06-09-2024 2/2 petitioners to file a fresh application.

3. In view of the submissions made at the Bar, the present quashing application stands dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty aforesaid.

4. Learned Advocate for the State is present. (Harish Kumar, J) uday/- U T