Jitendra Pratap Choudhary v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60275 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-234 Year-2025 Thana- SULTANGANJ District- Bhagalpur ====================================================== 1.
Jitendra Pratap Choudhary Son of Binay Kumar Choudhary Resident of Balu Ghat Road, Near Gopal Gate, P.S. - Sultanganj, Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur, Bihar, 813213.
2.
Dharmendra Pratap Choudhary Son of Binay Kumar Choudhary Resident of Balu Ghat Road, Near Gopal Gate, P.S. - Sultanganj, Sultanganj, District - Bhagalpur, Bihar, 813213.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Aryan Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Lakshmi Kant Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 18-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P for the State.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case, registered for offence punishable under Sections 318(4), 316(2), 303(2), 316(4), 316(5), 338, 336(3), 351(2), 352 and 60 of B.N.S., 2023.
3. As per F.I.R., allegation against these petitioners is that these petitioners in connivance with the F.I.R. named accused persons, manufactured forged documents to misappropriate the valuable assets of Math causing substantial loss and damage. It is also alleged that they threatened the Mahanth to kill or falsely implicate him in criminal cases. In praragraph 8 of the
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60275 of 2025(3) dt.18-09-2025 2/2 impugned order, there is a finding of the trial Court that there is possibility of repetition of offences and tampering with the evidence by the petitioners.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case.
5. Learned A.P.P. for the State vehemently opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail.
6. Considering the nature of accusation and the finding of the trial court, the prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioners is rejected.
(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) K.C.Jha/- U T