Patna High CourtCWJC/4125/2014dismissed

Satya Narain Choudhary @ S.N. Choudhary v. The Chairman Cum Managing Director, Bihar State Power Holding Company Ltd. And ORS

2016-01-06Mr. Justice Vikash Jain1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.4125 of 2014 ====================================================== Satya Narain Choudhary @ S.N. Choudhary, Son Of Late Tribeni Choudhary, Resident Of Mohalla - Sri Krishna Nagar Colony Mirzanhat Road, Ishak Chak (Naya Chak), P.S. and District - Bhagalpur .... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The Chairman cum Managing Director, Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

2. The Managing Director, South Bihar State Power (Distribution) Company Ltd., South Bihar, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

3. The Chief Engineer Planning, South Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

4. The Finance Controller, Financial Account, South Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

5. The Deputy Director, (Finance And Account), South , Bihar State Power (Holding) Company Limited, Vidyut Bhawan, Bailey Road, Patna

6. The Chief Engineer cum General Manager, Bhagalpur Electric Supply Area, Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur

7. The Deputy General Manager cum Electrical Superintending Engineer, Bhagalpur Electric Supply Area Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur

8. The Electrical Superintending Engineer, Bhagalpur Electric Supply Circle, Bhagalpur, District - Bhagalpur .... .... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : None For the Respondents : Mr. Vinay Kirti Singh, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VIKASH JAIN ORAL ORDER 06-01-2016 None appears on behalf of the petitioner despite repeated calls.

2. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the writ petition is not maintainable as the petitioner appears to be pursuing the stale claim relating to over a decade ago.

3. Be that as it may, in view of the non-appearance of the petitioner, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. B.T/- (Vikash Jain, J) U