Md. Jahir @ Md. Jahid And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.2936 of 2016 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -206 Year- 2015 Thana -CHHATAPUR District- SUPAUL ======================================================

1. Md. Jahir @ Md. Jahid

2. Md. Sahid both are sons of late Md. tohid Rahi Are resident of VillageMohanpur,katahra, Police Station Chhatapur, District supaul, .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Arun, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Chandra Bhushan Prasad(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 19-01-2016 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the State.

The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Section 306 of the Indian Penal Code.

The prosecution case is that the daughter of the informant was in love with co-accused Md. Miraz, but subsequently Md. Miraz refused to marry. It is alleged against the petitioner that the petitioner conveyed the massage of co-accused Md. Miraz that he is not agree to marry with the daughter of the informant. Subsequently, the daughter of the informant committed suicide. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioners that nothing on record to suggest that the victim

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.2936 of 2016 (2) dt.19-01-2016 was in love with Md. Miraz or the petitioner conveyed the massage of Md. Miraz to the informant. From perusal of the First Information Report, it appears that the victim committed suicide, when it was asked to take tea by the informant. It is further submitted that there is nothing on record to suggest any way the petitions awaited the offence. The impugned order des not suggest any material suggesting the love of awaited played by the petitioners. Statement has been made in para-3 of the petition that petitioners have no criminal antecedent. Considering the aforesaid facts, let the above named petitioners be released on bail in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned court below within a period of twelve weeks from today, on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.

10,000/- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-II, Supaul in connection with Chhatapur P.S. Case No. 206 of 2015, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. (Dinesh Kumar Singh, J) P.K.