Ramanand Yadav @ Ravan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63822 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-15 Year-2023 Thana- MEHUSH District- Sheikhpura ====================================================== Ramanand Yadav @ Ravan Son Of Naresh Yadav Resident Of Village - Kare, Police Station - Sheikhpura, District - Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Bipin Kumar, Adv For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL ORDER 17-10-2023 1.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

2.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Mehus P.S. Case No.15 of 2023 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 307, 324, and 326 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of Arms Act.

3.

There is a specific allegation of causing firearm injury on temple of the informant.

4.

The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that it is a case of false implication based on past enmity. The petitioner also has lodged at least two cases against the informant of the present case.

5.

The learned APP has opposed the prayer. It is

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63822 of 2023(2) dt.17-10-2023 2/2 submitted that the injury report shows spotted mark of burn over the diffused area of left face and muscular deep abrasion with an opinion that the injury may be by an explosive substance. The petitioner has been on hostile terms with the informant since before. He also has two criminal antecedents. 6.

Considering the rival submissions, the material in the course of investigation, antecedents of the petitioner, this Court is of the opinion that no case is made out for grant of anticipatory bail.

7.

Prayer for anticipatory bail is rejected.

8.

The petitioner's counsel submits that he would be availing the remedy of regular bail upon surrender. If such attempt is made by the petitioner, no doubt it has to be considered on its merits without in any way being affected by rejection of the instant application.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) SUMIT/- U T