Vinay Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51822 of 2017 (2) dt.03-11-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.51822 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -44 Year- 2016 Thana -JIRADEI District- SIWAN ====================================================== Vinay Kumar Singh, son of Kanhaiya Singh.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Sanjay Kumar Tiwary 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL ORDER 03-11-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Jeeradei P.S. Case No. 44 of 2016, registered under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379 and 504/34 of the Indian Penal Code, pending in the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Siwan. The accusation is that on 03.10.2017, scuffle took place in between the informant and his agnates named in the F.I.R., due to that reason, informant went at the Jeeradei Police Station. When he was returning with his wife and daughter, Urmali Devi and Kajal then his agnates, Bhual, Binay Kumar (petitioner), Ramawati Devi and Sangeeta Devi started to cause assault to them. At that time, petitioner caused injury at the head of Kajal through lathi, on which, she sustained injury. Thereafter,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.51822 of 2017 (2) dt.03-11-2017 Kalal was rushed to the Primary Health Centre, Jeeradei, from where, she was referred to Sadar Hospital, Siwan for better treatment.

It appears that the specific allegation against the petitioner to cause injury to Kajal, daughter of the informant, and her injury is grievous in nature.

Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and the nature of allegation against the petitioner, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, his prayer for grant of anticipatory bail stands rejected. The petitioner is directed to surrender before the trial court and pray for regular bail, which would be considered by the trial court in accordance with law without being prejudiced by the order of this Court.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U T