Nilam Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.4853 of 2010 =========================================================== Nilam Kumari, daughter of Sri Kishori Sah, wife of Sri Ashok Kumar, resident of Village- Basahiya, P.O.- Pipra Dadan, P.S. Kanhauli, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary Mr. Anjani Kumar Singh, Department of Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. Mr. Ashutosh, The Director, Primary Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
3. Mr. Dayanidhi Pandey, the District Magistrate, Sitamarhi
4. Mr. Shiv Shankar Prasad, the Member, District Teachers' Employment Appellate Authority, Sitamarhi
5. Mr. Manoj Kumar Verma, the District Superintendent of Education-cumProgram Co-ordinator, Sitamarhi
6. Mrs. Poonam Bala, the Block Education Officer, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi
7. Mr. Jai Kishore Sah @ Lalit, the Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Dostiya, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi
8. Mr. Krishna Kumar Mehta, the Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Dostiya, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi
9. Sri Yogendra Sah, the Headmaster, Government Middle School, Basahiya Hindi, Sonbarsa, District- Sitamarhi .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
For the Respondent/s : Mr. Sarvesh Kumar Singh, AAG-13 Mrs. Sunita Kumari, A.C. to AAG-13 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 12-07-2017 None is appearing for the petitioner. Mrs. Sunita Kumari appears for the respondents and points out that the order in question has to be complied with by the Mukhiya of the Gram Panchayat and notices have already been issued to him, as is evident from AnnexureA to the show-cause. However, neither the petitioner is appearing nor the Mukhiya is being served inspite of notice issued to him on 15.03.2017.
Patna High Court MJC No.4853 of 2010 dt.12-07-2017 2/2 Keeping in view the aforesaid, it is not appropriate now to keep this contempt application pending because the petition was filed in the year 2010. In case the petitioner has not been reinstated in pursuance to the order passed in the writ petition, the petitioner is granted liberty to approach this Court afresh and seek indulgence into the matter.
With the aforesaid liberty, the petition stands disposed of. (Rajendra Menon, CJ) P.K.P.
AFR/NAFR N.A.F.R.
CAV DATE N.A.
Uploading Date 14.07.2017 Transmission Date