Azaharuddin Mian @ Azaharuddin v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.60882 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-107 Year-2025 Thana- DARPA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Azaharuddin Mian @ Azaharuddin Son of Pir Mohammad Mian R/O VillagePipra Paschim Tola, P.S.- Darpa, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar, Patna ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Sunil Kumar No. III, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Navin Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 10-09-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, the State and the informant.
2. The petitioner is apprehending arrest in connection with Darpa P.S. Case No. 107 of 2025 instituted under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 118(1), 109, 74, 303(2),117(2), 352, 351(2), 3(5) of the Bhartiya Nayay Sanhita, 2023 lodged on 28.04.2025 by the informant, Robaida Khatoon.
3. As per the prosecution story, the allegation is that the accused persons came armed variously and further allegation against this petitioner is of assaulting the husband twice on his head by Farsa. Abdul Majeed assaulted the informant on her head by knife causing injuries. This led to the FIR.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that there is case and counter case, both are family members, it is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.60882 of 2025(2) dt.10-09-2025 2/2 unbelievable that between son and the mother, such kind of incidence can take place.
5. Learned counsel for the informant as also learned APP opposes the prayer and has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that the injury on the husband has been found to be grievous in nature while hairline fracture has been recorded so far as the informant is concerned.
6. It is to be noted that the injury on the husband has been inflicted by this petitioner.
7. In that background, no case of anticipatory bail is made out, rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) Ravi/- U T