Bugal Devi v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.55137 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-78 Year-2019 Thana- MANPUR District- Nalanda ====================================================== BUGAL DEVI Wife of Sri Guddu Yadav Resident of Village - Tetravan, P.S.- Manpur, District - Nalanda.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar.
... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Nandu Kumar Yadav For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Uday Pratap Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 02-09-2019 Petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019 (G.R. Case No. 2384 of 2019, registered for the offences punishable under Sections 363, 366A, 376, 120B/34 of the Indian Penal Code and subsequently added U/s 4 of the POCSO Act Petitioner happens to be the sister of the co-accused Chamu Yadav and there is allegation against the petitioner is that he helped the co-accused Chamu Yadav in kidnapping of the minor daughter of the informant.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that statement of the victim recorded under Section 164 Cr.P.C. in which she has stated that she was raped by Chamu Yadva but no sign of rape has been found in the medical report and furthermore this petitioner did not assist co-accused Chamu
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.55137 of 2019(2) dt.02-09-2019 2/2 Yadav in kidnapping. She is a lady.
Heard learned A.P.P. also.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within six weeks, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned 1st Additional Sessions Judge, Nalanda at Biharsharif, in connection with Manpur P.S. Case No. 78 of 2019 subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438
(2) of the Cr.P.C. and further condition is that one of the bailors of the petitioner shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the Court concerned.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) T.Kr./- U T