Rahul Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.63708 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-36 Year-2024 Thana- SHEIKHOPUR SARAI DistrictSheikhpura ====================================================== Rahul Kumar Son of Arun Prasad @ Vinay Mahto Village- Panchi PsSheikhopur Sarai Dist- Sheikhpura ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Chhaya Kirti For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Humayou Ahmad Khan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 20-11-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State.

2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in a case in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024 dated 12.03.2024 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B/34 of the I.P.C.

3. As per the prosecution case, the police personnel apprehended 13 persons and others fled away from the place of occurrence. The apprehended persons disclosed that the petitioner and the other accused persons are involved in providing loan to the people and also used to cheat them.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63708 of 2024(2) dt.20-11-2024 2/3

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case. The name of the petitioner has surfaced in this case merely on suspicion. It is further submitted that no incriminating article has been recovered from possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel has further submitted that the petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery as mentioned in the F.I.R. and he is not the member of any gang or associates of the alleged incident. The co-accused person has already been granted anticipatory bail by this court vide order dated 13.09.2024 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 46965 of 2024. The petitioner has clean antecedent as stated in paragraph no. 3 of the bail petition.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioner, in the event of his arrest/surrender within a period of six weeks from today, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees twenty thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Sheikhpura in connection with Sheikhopur Sarai

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.63708 of 2024(2) dt.20-11-2024 3/3 P.S. Case No. 36 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) guddukr/- U T