Vikash Sah v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.70112 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-211 Year-2020 Thana- HASANPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== VIKASH SAH Son of Buchchi Sah, Resident of Village - Aatapur, P.S.- Hasanpur, District - Samastipur.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Krishna Prasad Singh, Sr. Advocate Mr. Saket Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s:

Mr.J.N.Thakur, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 28-07-2022 The learned counsel for the petitioner is directed to remove all the defects pointed out by the office within one month.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with Hasanpur P.S. Case No. 211 of 2020 registered for offence punishable under sections 304 (B), 201, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation, the daughter of informant was married to the petitioner in the year 2019. She went to her matrimonial house and the accused persons, including the petitioner demanded Rs.50,000/- cash and a motor cycle, which

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.70112 of 2021(2) dt.28-07-2022 2/2 was not within the affording capacity of the informant. All of sudden in the night of 13.09.2020, the informant came to know that the accused persons had committed murder of the deceased and disappeared her dead body.

The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case.

The petitioner is husband. There is specific allegation him that he demanded Rs.50,000/- cash and a motor cycle in dowry demand and due to non-fulfillment of dowry demand, he committed murder of his wife along with other accused persons. As such, he does not deserve the privileges for anticipatory bail. Accordingly, his prayer for anticipatory bail is hereby rejected. Office shall ensure that all defects are removed by the petitioner within the stipulated time mentioned hereinabove, failing which, the matter shall be brought to the notice of this Court.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) Mahesh/- U T