← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./59974/2022bail granted

Rakesh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

2022-12-02Mr. Justice Jitendra Kumar4 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.59974 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-467 Year-2022 Thana- MOHANIYA District- Kaimur (Bhabua) ====================================================== 1.

RAKESH KUMAR Son of Sri Harihar Chaudhary R/V- Bishunpura, P.SNokha, Dist- Rohtas at Sasaram 2.

Md. Habil Son of Md. Samsul R/V- Raghuni Chak, P.S- Mansahi, DistKatihar 3.

Chandan Thakur Son of Late Vijay Thakur @ Vijay Kumar Thakur R/VKumadpur, P.S- Rangara Chauk (O.P.) Dist- Bhagalpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Chhote Lal Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Awadhesh Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 02-12-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

The petitioners seek bail in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 467 of 2022, registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016 and later on Section 409 of the Indian Penal Code is added.

As per allegation, about 23 litres of illicit liquor has been recovered from the rental rooms of Excise Department. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that

2/4 the petitioners are innocent and have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of the petitioners. The petitioners have been languishing in jail since 25.08.2022.

It is also stated in paragraph no. 2 of the petition that the petitioners have never moved before this Court for grant of anticipatory bail or regular bail.

It has further been stated that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

However, the learned APP for the State vehemently opposes the prayer of the petitioners for bail. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, particularly the small quantity, the petitioners, above-named, are directed to be released on bail on their furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the Ld. Special Judge, Excise-1, Kaimur at Bhabhua in connection with Mohania P.S. Case No. 467 of 2022 on the following conditions:

3/4 (i) The petitioners will make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer/court as and when required.

(ii) The petitioners will undertake that investigation/trial will not hamper on account of their absence or non-cooperation. They must be available to the police or the court whenever their presence is required. (iii) The petitioners shall not, directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer.

(iv) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that the petitioners have any criminal antecedents, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioners after hearing them and getting satisfied that the petitioners have concealed their criminal antecedents despite their knowledge of the same.

(v) In case, it is brought to the notice of the court below that statement regarding previous bail petition is

4/4 wrong, the learned court below shall cancel the bail bond of the petitioners.

The application stands allowed accordingly.

The learned counsel for the petitioners is directed to remove all the defects, if any, pointed out by the office within a period of one month and the Registry is directed to issue the certified copy of this order only after removal of office objections.

(Jitendra Kumar, J) ashishkr/- U T