Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61837/2024bail granted

Ram Pravesh Bhagat @ Ram Prawesh Bhagat v. The State Of Bihar

2024-09-04Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61837 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-310 Year-2024 Thana- SAHEBGANJ District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== Ram Pravesh Bhagat @ Ram Prawesh Bhagat S/o- Ramdevan Bhagat @ Ramdewan Bhagat Village- Madhopur PS-Sahebganj District-Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Yugal Kishore, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Yogendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 04-09-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 310 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 411, 413 and 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, the police has recovered one stolen bullet motorcycle from the tent house of the petitioner. The petitioner was apprehended on spot.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the petitioner has no

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61837 of 2024(2) dt.04-09-2024 2/2 knowledge about the fact that the motorcycle is a stolen one and has purchased the same under impression that Amit Kumar is the owner of the motorcycle and he made sure to provide all original documents to the petitioner shortly. The petitioner has been cheated by Amit Kumar for selling a theft motorcycle to him. The petitioner is in custody since 16.06.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sahebganj P.S. Case No. 310 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T