← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./61807/2024bail granted

Ritesh Yadav @ Nitesh Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2024-11-14Mr. Justice R. P. Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.61807 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-52 Year-2024 Thana- SAHAJITPUR District- Saran ====================================================== Ritesh Yadav @ Nitesh Yadav Son of Shambhu Yadav Resident of VillageHafijpur, P.S.-Sahazitpur, District- Saran at Chapra ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mrs. Rajani Kumari, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Renu Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 14-11-2024 Heard Mrs. Rajani Kumari, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mrs. Renu Kumari, learned APP for the State and perused the case diary.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 304(B), 201 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, daughter of the informant was tortured and done to death for non-fulfillment of dowry.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. Charge-sheet has been submitted in this case. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.61807 of 2024(3) dt.14-11-2024 2/2 petitioner is Bhaisur of the deceased. The petitioner is separate in mess and business from the husband of the deceased. It is further submitted that no specific allegation has been attributed against the petitioner. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is general and omnibus in nature. The petitioner is in custody since 04.06.2024 and has got no criminal antecedent.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Sahajitpur P.S. Case No. 52 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T