Kameshwar Singh Sanskrit Unive v. The State Of Bihar And ORS.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Review No.352 of 2010 In Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13253 of 2000 ======================================================
1. Kameshwar Singh Sanskrit University, Darbhanga, through its Registrar
2. The Vice Chancellor, Kameshwar Singh Sanskrit University, Darbhanga
3. The Registrar, Kameshwar Singh Sanskrit University, Darbhanga .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar through the Commissioner-cum-Secretary, Department of Higher Education, Government of Bihar, Patna
2. Sribar Mishra, son of Sri Hari Shankar Mishra resident of villageGajhara, P.S.- Ladamiya, District- Madhubani 3(a). Sri Satish Chandra Mishra, son of Late Narayan Mishra Clerk, Govt. Sanskrit College, Ranchi (Jharkhand) 3(b). Sri Jai Chand Mishra, Son of Late Narayan Mishra Forth Grade Employee, Sri Lakshmi Narayan Marbari Hindu Hospital, Godauliya, Varanasi (U.P.), Mobile No. 09198302572 3(c). Sri Ratish Chandra Mishra Son of Late Narayan Mishra Mahabir DieCasting, Plot No. 153, Sector-24, NIT, Faridabad (Haryana) Mobile No. 08802532438 3(d). Smt. Nita Devi, Daughter of Late Narayan Mishra, Wife of Sri Jaichand Mishra, Vill.+P.O.- Saurath, Musahari, Tola, Madhubani 3(e). Smt. Anita Mishra Daughter of Late Narayan Mishra, Wife of Sri Sushil Mishra, through Fauzi Yoginadra Singh, Vill- Bagheri, P.o.
- Siliyan, Tehsil- Nala Nagar, District- Sholan (H.P.) Mobile No. 09736171890 3(f). Smt. Punita Devi Daughter of Late Narayan Mishra, Wife of Sri Naresh Chandra Jha, Vill+P.O.- Kachhua-Chakauti, District- Sitamarhi ....
For the Petitioners : None For the O.P. Nos. 3(a) to 3(f): Mr. Hemant Kumar Jha, Advocate For the State:
Mr. Rakesh Prabhat, ACT to SC 9 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE RAVI RANJAN ORAL ORDER 04-05-2016 This is second consecutive occasion on which the petitioners did not appear. Earlier also on 27.04.2016 the petitioners did not appear.
However, learned counsel for the State and opposite
Patna High Court C. REV. No.352 of 2010 (9) dt.04-05-2016 party nos. 3(a) to 3(f) are present.
It appears that the petitioners have lost interest in this case.
Accordingly, this application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
(Dr. Ravi Ranjan, J) SC/- U